![]() ![]() One item of much debate was the inclusion of Russian-based “kompromat,” or blackmail, on Trump. "I stand by the work we did, the sources that we had and the professionalism which we applied to it,” Steele maintained. The legitimacy of what emerged from Steele’s investigation is still subject to debate, and much of the information remains unverified. “One was what the Russians were doing in terms of potential interference in the campaign, and two, what the links were between Trump and the Trump campaign and Russia,” Steele said of his investigation. ![]() Steele was asked to compile two sets of information, he told ABC News’ George Stephanopolous. The investigation was funded, in part, by Hillary Clinton’s campaign. In early 2016, Steele was approached by Glenn Simpson, a former reporter for The Wall Street Journal who went on to found Fusion GPS, a Washington, D.C.-based intelligence firm specializing in political and business research. When asked why he decided to publicly speak out on his investigation for the first time, Steele said he was not convinced that the problems he identified have gone away.Steele’s reports ultimately contributed to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into collusion between Trump and Russia, which in 2019 concluded there was no evidence of a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.While the legitimacy of what emerged from Steele’s investigation is still subject to debate, Steele said in part, "I stand by the work we did, the sources that we had and the professionalism which we applied to it".Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence official and author of a 2016 dossier that contained salacious information on then-presidential candidate Donald Trump, spoke out in his first televised interview since the contents of the dossier were made public.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |